8/8/09

Buddha and Jesus

FYI: this post has been moved here.
Share |

TwitThis

Posted by Ken
Labels: , , , ,

5 comments:

  1. mmcelhaneyAugust 8, 2009 at 4:33 PM

    Thanks, Mariano! This was fun!

    ReplyDelete
  2. BartAugust 9, 2009 at 10:40 PM

    No 'Pseudo skeptic' here. Both accounts were written long after the events. And there are no preserved original writings of either.

    Its logical and obvious that both myths were based on ordinary men. The subsequent followers embellished, then canonized the embellishments.

    I find it amusing that you can so easily dismiss one religion without realizing the same criticism falsify your own.

    ReplyDelete
  3. tremorAugust 10, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    @Bart
    Both accounts were written long after the events.
    How long exactly?
    And there are no preserved original writings of either.
    This is true for all Greek, Roman and Jewish writings of that times. You find none of them reliable?

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousAugust 11, 2009 at 2:52 AM

    That is nothing more then using a double standard and projecting that flaw onto others.

    The amount of time between the writing of the biblical texts and the events it describes are not even close to the time difference between buddha and his writings being made.

    Well since being written after things happen makes them false then obviously world war 2 never happened neither did the civil war or any other superstitious nonsense embellished by people afterwards.

    I just read a book about World War 2 and well since it was written a few years ago and world war 2 happened long before then it obviously was completely embellished and the people were just mythical characters. Hitler? Just an embellished and mythical character obviously. Why cant historians use logic and science to see the truth?

    ReplyDelete
  5. ganesh statueAugust 17, 2009 at 12:04 AM

    finally you update again!

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)