9/9/09

A Murder of Atheists, part 3

FYI: this post has been moved here.
Share |

TwitThis

Posted by Ken
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

11 comments:

  1. JoJoSeptember 9, 2009 at 2:53 PM

    A little off topic, but have any of you noticed that Mariano's kid looks retarded in his profile? And come to think of it Mariano looks a little downsey as well. Anyway, all around, Mariano's kid is fucked.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RylandSeptember 9, 2009 at 6:51 PM

    A little further off topic, sorry Mariano but Im gonna assume this jackass is going to see this before you delete both our comments, but has anyone noticed that Mariano's baby looks like a healthy, happy, beautiful little baby? I think so. More importantly, has anyone also noticed that all the atheists/anti-Christians who comment here are miserable little pissant pricks with attitude problems and gigantic inferiority complexes? Jojo, you a huge moron boy. I'd love it if that was my kid and you said that to my face. I'd beat you like a legless kitten.

    ReplyDelete
  3. JoJoSeptember 9, 2009 at 11:39 PM

    You'd beat a legless kitten? Dude that's just wrong. C'mon you can see the downs can't you?

    ReplyDelete
  4. JoJoSeptember 9, 2009 at 11:43 PM

    I love kittens.

    ReplyDelete
  5. JoJoSeptember 9, 2009 at 11:46 PM

    Plus I'm not an atheist, I'm Catholic. I'm just saying I see kids like that all the time, I can tell a birth defect.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousSeptember 10, 2009 at 1:10 AM

    I think the best argument for Christianity here isn't Mariano's article even though it explains atheist arbitrary and often meaningless arguments.

    The best argument is how utterly pathetic and childish are the majority of comments here by atheists or 'ahem' self proclaimed "catholics". We all know that such moronic and "mentally handicapped" reasoning is just so convincing and such a good example of the logic and priority these people place on reason.

    Its only through the anonymity of the internet that these people arent shunned and ridiculed as the 12 year olds they never mentally developed past that they truly are.

    ReplyDelete
  7. TedSeptember 10, 2009 at 8:26 AM

    The best argument [for Christianity] is how utterly pathetic and childish are the majority of comments here by atheists or 'ahem' self proclaimed "catholics".

    Best argument for Christianity? Is this how Christians reason? I bet you'd do a good job mowing my lawn, but beyond that I'd be quite skeptical as to your skillset.

    The best argument for Christianity is some clown making comments on a blog? Really?

    I think this JoJo pulled you in and made you look like an idiot anonymous.

    ReplyDelete
  8. JoJoSeptember 10, 2009 at 12:57 PM

    Ted said:
    I think this JoJo pulled you in and made you look like an idiot anonymous.


    I wouldn't dream of it Ted, I just push buttons and see what happens, that's all.

    I really mean it when I say there is something wrong with that kids head.

    Also, now that I think of it, it is astounding how quickly "anonymous" is willing to go from words to violence. He wrote:

    "Jojo, you a huge moron boy. I'd love it if that was my kid and you said that to my face. I'd beat you like a legless kitten."

    ReplyDelete
  9. RylandSeptember 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM

    Jojo, your a loser.

    Peace loser.
    Ryland

    ReplyDelete
  10. JoJoSeptember 10, 2009 at 5:00 PM

    Ryland I meant, not anonymous, my mistake.

    Oh and it's "you're a loser" not "your a loser".

    ReplyDelete
  11. jdhueySeptember 10, 2009 at 7:56 PM

    First of all, Drange’s argument is clearly contrary to the biblical record which makes the resurrection necessary for salvation (Rom. 4:25; 10:9). Indeed, Paul said, “If Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins!” (1 Cor. 15:17).

    This is an inane counter to Drange’s argument. The question is not whether or not Paul wrote what he wrote but whether it makes any logical sense. The idea that something is true just because it is in the Bible, while a common Christian belief, is intellectually childish and certainly not germane to the argument.

    …In short, if Jesus the Son of God cannot defeat death, then how can we mortals do it. Further, since death was brought about by the Devil, then resurrection is necessary to defeat God’s Adversary the Devil (Heb. 2:14-15).

    This makes no logical sense at all – whether or not an incarnate God can ‘defeat’ death is immaterial to the question of can a regular mortal do it (by whatever means). For example, let’s say the crucifixion was a real and true death and not just a little side trip to the afterlife. Then, after a bit of mourning, God could have split open the vault of Heaven and stuck his head in and shouted out to the world: “Look, you asshats, my Son just eat the big one for you guys, so I’m going to institute this new afterlife policy of Resurrection. Personally, I don’t think you folks deserve it but, hey, if Jesus thought it was that important so be it. And, by the way, ignore all that crap that that guy Saul/Paul says, he’s a loon.” God could then go back to watching re-runs of American Idol and this different version of Christianity could proceed apace. No Jesus zombie needed.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)